A lit high street at dusk with people sitting at a canopy bench charging phones and working on laptops
Grid relief

A phone charge is nothing. Everyone's phone charge is not nothing.

This is the number nobody in our category publishes, probably because it takes some care to state honestly. Charging a phone from a bench that filled its own battery at midday removes a small amount of demand from the network in the late afternoon, which happens to be the most carbon-intense and most constrained part of the day. Multiply it by a town, then by ten boroughs, then by the country. The number that matters is not how much energy a bench gives away, it is how much of that energy genuinely replaces a charge that would otherwise have come from a socket. That share is a slider on this page rather than an assumption buried inside it.

40,587 kWh

Grid energy displaced a year at the current model settings

Estimated

12.6 kW

Demand removed from the late afternoon peak window

Estimated

9.9 t

CO2e avoided a year, weighted to the hours it is actually avoided in

Estimated

Grid average intensity

Verified

0.207 kg/kWh

Used for off-peak displacement

Evening peak intensity

Verified

0.312 kg/kWh

Used for the 4pm to 7pm window

Sessions in the peak window

Assumed

34%

Bench use is heaviest as people finish the day

Cost to the person charging

Verified

£0

There is no meter, so there is nothing to bill

The model

Move the displacement share first. It is the only input that can flatter us.

If every session at a bench were counted as a saving, the answer would be meaningless, because a share of that charging only happens because the bench is there. Set the share you believe. At fifty five per cent we are saying roughly half of bench charging replaces a wall socket and the rest is new convenience. A procurement team that wants a conservative number can drag it down and still see a result.

Assumptions

Benches deployed

1,600

Charging sessions per bench per day

18

Energy per session

9 Wh

Seasonal availability

78 per cent of nameplate

Share that displaces a mains charge

55 per cent

Energy given away

Estimated

73,794 kWh

126 Wh per bench per day

Grid energy displaced

Estimated

40,587 kWh

After the displacement share is applied

Peak demand removed

Estimated

12.6 kW

Averaged across the three hour evening window

Charging sessions

Estimated

8,199,360

A year, across the fleet

CO2e avoided

Estimated

9.9 t

8.4 t at flat grid average

Homes equivalent

Estimated

15.0

Against 2,700 kWh a year per home

Generator litres avoided

Estimated

13,093

If the same energy came from event diesel instead

Estimated
Scale, at your assumptions

One high street, then ten boroughs, then the country.

These four rows all use the displacement share, energy per session and seasonal availability you set above, so the story cannot be improved by quietly changing the assumptions between rows.

One high street
Benches
12
Grid energy displaced
372 kWh
Peak removed
0.1 kW
CO2e avoided
0.1 t
Free charges a year
75,161
One town centre
Benches
60
Grid energy displaced
1,691 kWh
Peak removed
0.5 kW
CO2e avoided
0.4 t
Free charges a year
341,640
Greater Manchester, ten boroughs
Benches
1,600
Grid energy displaced
40,587 kWh
Peak removed
12.6 kW
CO2e avoided
9.9 t
Free charges a year
8,199,360
UK, one per 2,000 people
Benches
34,000
Grid energy displaced
766,640 kWh
Peak removed
238.0 kW
CO2e avoided
186.1 t
Free charges a year
154,876,800
Charge at the bench near you

Your own habit, with the negatives left in.

The fleet model above answers the policy question. This answers the personal one. It uses the same displacement share you set, and it deliberately reports the three things that work against the saving: charges that only happen because the power is free, any journey made to reach the bench, and the winter months when the bench is rationing and cannot serve the habit at all. Household savings use a unit rate of £0.245 per kWh.

Your habit

Charges taken at a bench per week

4 a week

Energy per charge

9 Wh

Benches within an easy walk

2

Walk to the nearest bench

4 min

Share of charge trips made by car

0 per cent

Months the bench can serve at full rate

8 months

Energy taken from benches

Estimated

1.59 kWh

A year, after winter rationing

Kept off your meter

Estimated

0.88 kWh

Worth about £0.21 a year

Grid carbon avoided

Estimated

0.18 kg

CO2e a year, at the grid average

Net effect

Estimated

−0.18 kg

CO2e a year, after any car trips

Charges that are new demand

Estimated

80

A year. Not a saving, and counted separately

Charges winter cannot serve

Estimated

31

Deferred by rationing rather than assumed away

Carbon added by driving to charge

Estimated

0.00 kg

Three kilometre round trip in an average car

People one nearby bench can serve

Estimated

91

At your rate of use, before rationing

Reading

Net saving of 0.2 kg CO2e a year for one person. Trivial alone, which is the whole point: the same habit across a town is where the number becomes a network effect rather than a gesture.

Estimated

Induced demand

Free power invites top-ups that would not otherwise happen. Those charges are real load on the bench and they are not a grid saving. The calculator shows them as a separate number rather than absorbing them.

A journey made to reach the bench

If somebody drives to charge, the trip wipes out the saving many times over. Three kilometres in an average car costs roughly the same carbon as a hundred phone charges. This is the strongest argument for siting benches where people already sit.

Winter rationing

A December bench in the north of England generates a fraction of a June bench. Charging is the first thing the priority logic sheds, so some of the habit simply cannot be served and the model defers those charges rather than pretending they happened.

Embodied carbon comes first

The bench spends its carbon at manufacture and earns it back slowly through delivered energy. The delivered-energy line is the smallest of the offset levers, and the materials and take-back lines are where the real reduction sits.

What it mitigates

The kilowatt hours are the small part. Where and when they land is the point.

Peak demand at the most carbon-intense hours

A bench discharges from a store it filled earlier in the day, so the relief lands in the late afternoon and evening window rather than at midday. That is the part of the curve where each avoided kilowatt hour is worth the most in carbon terms.

Charge anxiety that turns into a car journey

People cut a visit short, drive home early or take a taxi because a phone is about to die. A charge point where people already sit removes that trigger. We report this as a behavioural effect, not as a carbon number, because it cannot be measured from the bench alone.

Single-point charging queues in venues

Sites currently solve this with a powered locker on a mains spur, which needs a cable, a meter and a bill. Distributed self-powered seating removes both the spur and the queue.

Diesel at events and temporary sites

Where a generator is genuinely removed from a plan rather than merely left idle, the displaced energy converts directly into litres not burned. This is the one line where the saving is large per unit.

What it does not do

We would rather publish the limits than have a buyer find them.

Replace generation capacity. A national fleet of benches is a distributed peak-shaving layer, not a power station, and we will not present it as one.

Move a large organisation's total footprint on its own. The material carbon story is in the material and the take-back, not in the electricity.

Work without honest displacement accounting. If every session is counted as a saving, the number is worthless, which is why the displacement share is an input on this page rather than an assumption inside it.